breakdown, book: the basic work of aristotle!

breakdown, book: the basic work of aristotle!. My sample paper here deals with two separate arguments, but remember that your paper may only consider one long argument, or maybe it will have three or more very short ones to consider. Just don’t forget about the 3-page limit.My guide is in three sections:When you read this guide, you will see that for each section I have color coded each premise or conclusion. If you take argument #1, for example, you can read the first premise (colored in Red) in each part of the paper:In all three places, the premise is saying the same thing. This is crucial and the bulk of your grade, for you must make sure that your representation of the argument you have chosen to analyze follows the argument exactly.So will want to do something similar to what I have done here in your notes, numbering the premises or color-coding each as you find them in the text itself, then putting them into a logical form in your notes (using the same number or color for each), and then writing them into the “I reply that” of your paper. Then, to check your work, go back and read each instance of the premise, in the text itself, in your logical breakdown, and in your actual paper. Make sure they are all saying the same thing, but do not plagiarize the argument. Put it in your own words.Do this for each premise of the argument you are analyzing.Then read them all together. Does the argument make sense? Do you have all of the premises? Are their any implicit premises you overlooked?Then, at the end, you will either support the argument or offer a criticism:argument essay: choose if you support or criticize if you support explain why and jump straight to the objectionif you criticize explain why and what is plato doing wrong.?the example is in the file below pleaseee read!!!!!!!!!!!book: the basic works of aristotle.

3 to 5 -Page Report: Attach in appropriate assignment area as a

3 to 5 -Page Report: Attach in appropriate assignment area as a .doc or .pdf document, double space, 12 point font, Times New Roman font style, indented paragraphs, no extra lines between paragraphs, page numbers on every page except the first. Include the title of the paper and your name as a “byline” on the first page.

I got a very tough assignment from my professor and i was

I got a very tough assignment from my professor and i was unable to do it. I asked my friend for some Legit writing service and he told me one, and i found it very friendly and very cooperative with the best solutions, it was named YourPerfectEssay and they did a tremendous job for me.

Write a 5 page Pro paper on Plato’s Image arranging theory. Use

Write a 5 page Pro paper on Plato’s Image arranging theory. Use the formate below to write the paper. Pro Introduction: Plato (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion: (give conclusion). He supports this conclusion with the following premises: (a) (give first premise) and (b) (give second premise). This essay will examine each premise in the light of objectors and then defend Plato from these objections.The possible objection to the first premise (give the objection(s)).Reply to the first objection (give pointed reply).The possible objection to the second premise (give the objection(s)).Reply to the second objection (give pointed reply).Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests) your response for this question should be 1 page .

Aristotle and Plato based essay

Question: Is it still worthwhile to study ancient political philosophy today? Or, do you think that the classical texts (written by Socrates, Plato, Aristotle) are fun books to read but do not teach us invaluable lessons anymore?The essay should include:1) Your argument and supports2) The supports should include two or more examples from the readings/ books- Read the next paragraph- The examples should refer to both Plato’s and Aristotle’s texts.3) Six or more citations from the readings4) The length of the essay should be more than 700 wordsLet me give you an example. Title:(Argument) Classical texts are not even fun books to read and the lessons are anachronistic. We should not exaggerate the importance of classical texts and spend more time studying texts written by our contemporaries.(Example 1) For instance, Plato’s criticism of democracy is based on the belief that the average citizens are incapable to decide their best interest. (Quotes and explanations). I disagree with Plato because (your thoughts)(Example 2) Aristotle thinks that the purpose of establishing a state is to give the members the good life. (Quotes and explanations). But I think the state should not decide what is good for its people because (your thoughts).(Conclusion) Classical texts are anachronistic. Now you understand what 1) Your argument and support, 2) two (or more) examples, and 3) six (or more) citations mean.One thing to make sure, I do not judge your argument. I won’t feel offended or deduct points even if you say the ancient political thoughts are not worthwhile to study at all. What I evaluate is your support and the use of the readings.Instructions

Goal: Analyze a Venn Diagram to show the similarities, differences, and relationships

Goal: Analyze a Venn Diagram to show the similarities, differences, and relationships and argue its effectiveness. Understand how Venn diagrams are used in logic and/or problem solvingDirections:Why do we diagram arguments? For many, seeing helps connect ideas and concepts that can be complex and difficult to grasp. By understanding the elements and components visually we are better able to critically build and understand an argument. For this week’s forum, you will find one (1) Venn Diagram and do the following:- Find an interesting Venn Diagram on the internet. Google or Yahoo (or whatever you use) “Venn diagrams for deductive logic” OR “Venn diagrams for problem solving.” Find a video or example you like and understand and be sure to include a link to the video, website, problem or example.- Discuss what the Venn Diagram is trying to communicate.- Explain why the Venn Diagram is effective or not effective. – Discuss whether the Venn Diagram made solving the problem or understanding the relationships in a categorical argument easier.Forum Guidelines:must be 250 words in length. Trigger questions: What is the value of diagramming an argument? How can a Venn diagram help with critical thinking?What are the uses of truth tables?What are the differences in kinds of arguments?What are the differences in kinds of appeals?Why is understanding purpose and audienceso important in critical thinking?How can an outline help me? How can you build one?How can mathematical models help me think critically?

I will attach the arguments for the essay and the attachments needed

I will attach the arguments for the essay and the attachments needed for the sources.

I will attach the arguments for the essay and the attachments needed

I will attach the arguments for the essay and the attachments needed for the sources.

I got a very tough assignment from my professor and i was

I got a very tough assignment from my professor and i was unable to do it. I asked my friend for some Legit writing service and he told me one, and i found it very friendly and very cooperative with the best solutions, it was named YourPerfectEssay and they did a tremendous job for me.

Evaluate Hume’s account of experience. Do you agree with his empiricism? must

Evaluate Hume’s account of experience. Do you agree with his empiricism? must also respond to two other students’ discussion posts

Are there any problems with Hume’s epistemology? Is Kant’s criticism correct? Do

Are there any problems with Hume’s epistemology? Is Kant’s criticism correct? Do you think Kant is right with his answer of a third category of knowledge? Explain. must also respond to two other discussion posts.

-Pick any topic-1 to 2 pages-MLA Format1) What does Socrates mean by

-Pick any topic-1 to 2 pages-MLA Format1) What does Socrates mean by living an examined life? Or
an unexamined life? Do you agree? What does living an examined life mean to you? Defend your position.2) Socrates says that it is unwise to fear death for two main reasons; one is ethical, the other epistemic. He claims that living a “good life” is more important than living a long life (the ethical objection) and that we don’t know what death is really like, so fearing it is “thinking you know when you do not know” (the epistemic objection). Do you agree or disagree with these objections? Pick ONE of these two objections and either critique or defend it.The Symposium1) Pick one of the speeches in praise of Love (Eros) from the dialogue, and either critique or defend it using concrete examples to make your case. You can also add your own contribution(s) to the speech if you think that it could be improved or altered to make it a stronger, more philosophically sound account of Eros (feel free to draw from the other speeches in the dialogue when you do this).2) Get creative and write your own speech in praise of (or in condemnation of) Love. Feel free to borrow elements from the speeches and class discussions that we’ve had on the topic, but be sure to make it your own and defend your position against possible objections.”The Allegory of the Cave”1) Although we did not read the actual “Allegory,” we discussed it extensively in class. It is a powerful metaphor with many layers. One element to the story involves the deception of the prisoners in the cave by puppet masters projecting shadows on the cave wall. Plato was most likely alluding to the politicians of his day with this metaphor, but who are the modern day “puppet masters”? The media, organized religion, public schooling, politicians, advertising? Pick a “puppet master,” and write an essay exploring, through examples, the way in which information, facts, and truth are presented to the general public in a deceptive manner–thereby distorting our view of reality. Don’t get carried away here with your assertions, though: use concrete evidence and examples to support your claims.

In an essay of 400 words explain what Aristotle means by courage

In an essay of 400 words explain what Aristotle means by courage and why courage is important.-In an essay of 400 words explain what Aristotle means by the word “justice.”-In an essay of 400 words explain what Aristotle means by practical wisdom.-In an essay of 400 words explain what moral strength is.-In an essay of 400 words explain what happiness is.-In an essay of 400 words compare the ethical principles of Aristotle with those Jesus.-In an essay of 400 words explain what Jesus means by the Kingdom of God.-In an essay of 400 words explain what Aristotle means when he says the moral virtue is the result of habit.-Why does Jesus put such a great emphasis on faith?Each question in one paper of 400 words

DUE: TUESDAY, October 8 (by midnight via Canvas)Format: 2½–3 pages, 1” margins,

DUE: TUESDAY, October 8 (by midnight via Canvas)Format: 2½–3 pages, 1” margins, double-spaced, 10-12 pt font. Please do not add a cover sheet. Simply include your name, course number (AIS 320), and Essay 1 at the top of the page (either centered or adjusted left).Also, no secondary sources are required. You need only refer to the reading assignments (and lectures, when appropriate). However, whenever you cite or quote from your textbook, The American Indian Intellectual Tradition, please state the page number in parentheses at the end of your citation or quotation. For example, “William Apess brings up the issue of a disputed deed to Marshpee land, which he makes the central part of his argument to the Massachusetts General Court that the state is responsible for redressing the Marshpee’s grievance against Phineas Fish (64-65).” Furthermore, whenever making a direct quote from the book, quotations should be brief, a sentence or two at a time. Please avoid using lengthy block quotes.Instructions: Making references to the authors read in Part 2 of your textbook, The American Indian Intellectual Tradition, namely La Flesche, Johnson, Winnemucca, Kellogg, Coolidge, Wheelock, Roe Cloud, Parker, Montezuma, Eastman, and Zitkala-Sa, answer the following questions:(NB: When answering the above questions, it is important that you do not simply reference the same readings in each answer. Mix it up a bit.)

introduction for the topic The Role of Spirituality in Healing

The outline for the Final paper is due next Monday, 10/7.Here is the outline in brief. A full explanation is below this. I will say this a thousand time: THIS IS NOT A REPORT! Aim to write in the first person and share you ideas throughout. Quotes should always be introduced by you, and followed by your comments and examples. Unless it is an inset longer quote, you should never have a paragraph of all quotes! So the outline should be about your ideas, not just the quotes you will use. Please also note Section Headers are in Bold, and subheadings are in italics. As always, this is too much to take in at once, so look at the specifics as you write.Intro and thesis: 3-4 sentences in your own voice of lead in to your opinion based this of what you think and why. For the outline/intro assignment you need to offer a full intro and thesis. Background: Offer one paragraph of what interests you personally on this topic. (For the outline you need only offer your topic sentence/first sentence for each heading and subheading.)My Experience Talk about your own experience with the topic, no quotes.Some Definitions You can quote some, but frame in your voice.Issues Share what you see as major issues. Include some quote.Analysis You may have 1 paragraph of introduction into your own points, but you may also just begin your points. (For the outline you need only offer your topic sentence/first sentence for our claims per point. You can mention who you will quote, and your example for the CER analysis paragraphs also.). Point one (choose your own name) Note: For the outline do include the bullet points for claim/quote/reasoning and example. For the draft and final paper you of course remove the bullet points. Only headers and subheadings should remain.Point Two (choose your own name) Point Three (choose your own name) Conclusion In your own voice, summarize your ideas and findings, then re-state the thesis in a new way. Don’t just repeat it. ( You might want to try a full conclusion now, but have at least the first sentence).Bibliography Include all source referenced for the paper, not just the ones quoted.I have attached references and also sample outine paper to help.

of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

Discuss i about 400 words the Political Philosophies of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes.No plagiarism

ETHICS (2 page essay, single spaced)

Movie Name: The Pursuit of Happyness https://www.netflix.com/title/70044605 For the essay: 2 page essay, single spaced. For the presentations: it is going to be a group work. and my part is answering question number 3 in 3 slides.this is the question ? 3) How do the scenes/characters link to each other and to the director’s questions?__________________________________________________PRESENTATION RUBRICS1) Context/Pretext regarding the film?2) What questions (ethical) is the director asking?3) How do the scenes/characters link to each other and to the director’s questions?4) What are the specific business ethics at stake?For Instance:a) Working conditionsd) Accounting Fraudb) Affirmative Actione) Social Media Policiesc) Whistle blowingf) Surveillance Violations5) How do the characters respond to these ethical issues?For Instance:a) Where do the responsibilities lie? b) Are the issues ignored altogether? 6) What ethical questions are prompted by this film?=======================================INDIVIDUAL ESSAY RUBRICSSection 1)Extracting the question(s):a) As far as you are concerned, what ethical question(s) arose from the film of your/the group’s choice?—parse out the intricacies of the question(s) as you see it/themb) As far as you are concerned, what ethical question(s) were addressed insufficiently or not at all (but should hav
e been)? Section 2)Response to the question(s):a) Having identified and fleshed out your question(s), what are your thoughts?In what ways would you (would you?) claim responsibility for these ethical issues?How does this response square with your worldview? Section 3)What soft claim can you make toward some resolve of the ethical issue(s)?Section 4)What new questions arise for you from sections 1-3?

ETHICS (2 page essay, single spaced)

Movie Name: The Pursuit of Happyness https://www.netflix.com/title/70044605 For the essay: 2 page essay, single spaced. For the presentations: it is going to be a group work. and my part is answering question number 3 in 3 slides.this is the question ? 3) How do the scenes/characters link to each other and to the director’s questions?__________________________________________________PRESENTATION RUBRICS1) Context/Pretext regarding the film?2) What questions (ethical) is the director asking?3) How do the scenes/characters link to each other and to the director’s questions?4) What are the specific business ethics at stake?For Instance:a) Working conditionsd) Accounting Fraudb) Affirmative Actione) Social Media Policiesc) Whistle blowingf) Surveillance Violations5) How do the characters respond to these ethical issues?For Instance:a) Where do the responsibilities lie? b) Are the issues ignored altogether? 6) What ethical questions are prompted by this film?=======================================INDIVIDUAL ESSAY RUBRICSSection 1)Extracting the question(s):a) As far as you are concerned, what ethical question(s) arose from the film of your/the group’s choice?—parse out the intricacies of the question(s) as you see it/themb) As far as you are concerned, what ethical question(s) were addressed insufficiently or not at all (but should have been)? Section 2)Response to the question(s):a) Having identified and fleshed out your question(s), what are your thoughts?In what ways would you (would you?) claim responsibility for these ethical issues?How does this response square with your worldview? Section 3)What soft claim can you make toward some resolve of the ethical issue(s)?Section 4)What new questions arise for you from sections 1-3?

ETHICS (2 page essay, single spaced)

Movie Name: The Pursuit of Happyness https://www.netflix.com/title/70044605 For the essay: 2 page essay, single spaced. For the presentations: it is going to be a group work. and my part is answering question number 3 in 3 slides.this is the question ? 3) How do the scenes/characters link to each other and to the director’s questions?__________________________________________________PRESENTATION RUBRICS1) Context/Pretext regarding the film?2) What questions (ethical) is the director asking?3) How do the scenes/characters link to each other and to the director’s questions?4) What are the specific business ethics at stake?For Instance:a) Working conditionsd) Accounting Fraudb) Affirmative Actione) Social Media Policiesc) Whistle blowingf) Surveillance Violations5) How do the characters respond to these ethical issues?For Instance:a) Where do the responsibilities lie? b) Are the issues ignored altogether? 6) What ethical questions are prompted by this film?=======================================INDIVIDUAL ESSAY RUBRICSSection 1)Extracting the question(s):a) As far as you are concerned, what ethical question(s) arose from the film of your/the group’s choice?—parse out the intricacies of the question(s) as you see it/themb) As far as you are concerned, what ethical question(s) were addressed insufficiently or not at all (but should have been)? Section 2)Response to the question(s):a) Having identified and fleshed out your question(s), what are your thoughts?In what ways would you (would you?) claim responsibility for these ethical issues?How does this response square with your worldview? Section 3)What soft claim can you make toward some resolve of the ethical issue(s)?Section 4)What new questions arise for you from sections 1-3?

review (700 words / 1.5 pages)

One place we absorb the myths of our culture, or the “shadows on the wall,” is at the movies. Popular culture is rife with stories about what matters, what makes life meaningful, and what it means to be a success in the world today.The term “motivated representations” was coined by prolific author, professor, feminist, and social activist, Gloria Jean Watkins (1952 – present), better known by her pen name bell hooks.In a world of motivated representations, critical thinking is a way to protect yourself from biased influences, by detecting ideological content in popular media. WATCH: (9:23 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLMVqnyTo_0Or read the transcript: https://www.mediaed.org/transcripts/Bell-Hooks-Transcript.pdf (Links to an external site.)REFLECT: What perspective does bell hooks bring when watching a film critically?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjDjIWPwcPUInstructions: Watch the film and write a film review essay in which you identify and critique ideological reasoning at work in the selected film text, Black Panther. Words: 700 – 800 words.

My sample paper here deals with two separate arguments, but remember that

My sample paper here deals with two separate arguments, but remember that your paper may only consider one long argument, or maybe it will have three or more very short ones to consider. Just don’t forget about the 3-page limit.My guide is in three sections:When you read this guide, you will see that for each section I have color coded each premise or conclusion. If you take argument #1, for example, you can read the first premise (colored in Red) in each part of the paper:In all three places, the premise is saying the same thing. This is crucial and the bulk of your grade, for you must make sure that your representation of the argument you have chosen to analyze follows the argument exactly.So will want to do something similar to what I have done here in your notes, numbering the premises or color-coding each as you find them in the text itself, then putting them into a logical form in your notes (using the same number or color for each), and then writing them into the “I reply that” of your paper. Then, to check your work, go back and read each instance of the premise, in the text itself, in your logical breakdown, and in your actual paper. Make sure they are all saying the same thing, but do not plagiarize the argument. Put it in your own words.Do this for each premise of the argument you are analyzing.Then read them all together. Does the argument make sense? Do you have all of the premises? Are their any implicit premises you overlooked?Then, at the end, you will either support the argument or offer a criticism:

breakdown, book: the basic work of aristotle!