First, go to the “What Color is Your Parachute?” website and

First, go to the “What Color is Your Parachute?” website and. Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays   First, go to the “What Color is Your Parachute?” website and read “The Seven Rules to Keep in Mind about Taking Career Tests” toward the bottom of the web page. Keep these in mind when doing the assessments for this section and others we’ll do as part of the class. To get a Holland-like Code, use the O*NET Interest Profiler (preferred site) or go to “RCC Holland Code” and take the online test. Record your three letter interest codes. These sites use the Holland Code profile to help you explore related education and career options. Once you have your code, you can explore occupations at O*NET or try going to Career Zone and selecting “Assess Yourself.” Enter your letter code in steps on the hexagon. If you click on one of the occupations listed, information about that career is shown. If you use the University of Indiana site, you will be able to link to college majors that are often preferred by individuals with similar interests. (Also, the Self-Directed Search site has a section you can access without paying anything, but to use the whole site, you need to pay $9.95, which we do not expect you to do.) Required for Participation Points Each of you needs to submit a post to this Threaded Discussion in the Discussion Board on the following (Please include your code in the title of your post.): Summarize your own Holland Code Profile. Which set of letters seems to best describe your interest areas? What does this mean to you? How well do you feel these summary codes describe you? How does your Holland Code link with your academic major and possible career direction? Remember that within each major and career, typically there are a range of interests represented. Help others interpret their codes. What do you share in terms of similarities and differences with other students based on their interest areas? I am really looking forward to seeing what you all come up with

Chapter 2 discusses the importance of Self esteem, positive affirmations, and

 Chapter 2 discusses the importance of Self esteem, positive affirmations, and multiple intelligences in career exploration.  Read the 19 strategies to develop positive self esteem in Chapter 2.  Which 5 strategies do you  most identify with?  Which ones do you need to further develop?  Write one action step for each of the 5 areas you can take to further develop them?   

How would you describe Emily Dickinson’s poem “Because I could not

 How would you describe Emily Dickinson’s poem “Because I could not stop for Death –”  to someone who has never read it? 

After reading this poem explain why Whitman would or would not

  After reading this poem explain why Whitman would or would not enjoy taking this class: When I heard the learn’d astronomer, When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me, When I was shown the charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them, When I sitting heard the astronomer where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room, How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick, Till rising and gliding out I wander’d off by myself, In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time, Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars. What does this have to do with Robin Dove’s statement that in American poetry there are “multiple ways to get to true feeling” during her Bill Moyer’s interview.

In 3-5 sentences explain this internet comment on Howl using an

  In 3-5 sentences  explain this internet comment on Howl using an example from the poem: Howl is about madness: it’s supposed to be confusing. That’s the point. Also, Ginsberg never thought it would be so widely read(https://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4389/allen-ginsberg-the-art-of-poetry-no-8-allen-ginsberg) , so it contains a lot of references to people and places that his friends would have known about, but which require a bit of explanation for the contemporary reader. (e.g., “N.C.” in line 43.) On the other hand, the use of the “long line” that Ginsberg borrowed from Walt Whitman gives the poem a rhythm that resembles ordinary speech. Try to keep up with the frenetic speaker and his intense emotions, and don’t worry too much about making sense of every last word and detail.

How does the Bob Dylan song (lyrics and live version below)

  How does the Bob Dylan song (lyrics and live version below) qualify as a poem?  How can it be applied to Paul Dunbar’s We Wear the Mask and our friend Connie in Oat’s short story “Where are you going?  Where have you been?” You must write 2 reasons why it can be applied to Dunbar’s poem and 2 reasons why it can be applied to Connie. This is worth the most so give me a full answer. feel free to use quotes from the song.   Actual lyrics to “Like A Rolling Stone”: Once upon a time you dressed so fine You threw the bums a dime in your prime, didn’t you? People’d call, say, “Beware doll, you’re bound to fall” You thought they were all kiddin’ you You used to laugh about Everybody that was hangin’ out Now you don’t talk so loud Now you don’t seem so proud About having to be scrounging for your next meal How does it feel How does it feel To be without a home Like a complete unknown Like a rolling stone? You’ve gone to the finest school all right, Miss Lonely But you know you only used to get juiced in it And nobody has ever taught you how to live on the street And now you find out you’re gonna have to get used to it You said you’d never compromise With the mystery tramp, but now you realize He’s not selling any alibis As you stare into the vacuum of his eyes And ask him do you want to make a deal? How does it feel How does it feel To be on your own With no direction home Like a complete unknown Like a rolling stone? You never turned around to see the frowns on the jugglers and the clowns When they all come down and did tricks for you You never understood that it ain’t no good You shouldn’t let other people get your kicks for you You used to ride on the chrome horse with your diplomat Who carried on his shoulder a Siamese cat Ain’t it hard when you discover that He really wasn’t where it’s at After he took from you everything he could steal How does it feel How does it feel To be on your own With no direction home Like a complete unknown Like a rolling stone? Princess on the steeple and all the pretty people They’re drinkin’, thinkin’ that they got it made Exchanging all kinds of precious gifts and things But you’d better lift your diamond ring, you’d better pawn it babe You used to be so amused At Napoleon in rags and the language that he used Go to him now, he calls you, you can’t refuse When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose You’re invisible now, you got no secrets to conceal How does it feel How does it feel To be on your own With no direction home Like a complete unknown Like a rolling stone? Copyright © 1965 by Warner Bros. Inc.; renewed 1993 by Special Rider Music 

3. Health

3. Health

What is contextual inquiry? How does contextual inquiry relate to the design

What is contextual inquiry? How does contextual inquiry relate to the design thinking process? What is the importance of an empathy map? How will you use these methods for your group project?

INDIVIDUAL COMMENTARY: Discuss how the above analysis contributes to the texture and architeXture of the text.

Schedule for GROUP WORK Analyze a. [Week 7] text into clausesb. [Week 8] for Transitivity structure: process, participant, circumstancec. [Week 9] for Logical structure: simple vs. complex: parataxis / hypotaxis(clause level)d. [Week 10] for Mood (declarative / interrogative/ imperative) and modality.e. [Week 11] for Theme structureINDIVIDUAL COMMENTARY[Week 13] Discuss how the above analysis contributes to the texture and architeXture of a text in the TV show Sunset Limited.

Library exercise #3 — Adding Databases

  This discussion thread is designed to help you become familiar with some additional features of OneSearch.  OneSearch is a service that is available through UMUC’s Library and Information Services website.  It allows a user to locate scholarly articles and other resources through a single search engine. Please watch library tutorial #3. Then respond to this discussion thread by completing the following tasks and answering the following questions: 1. Select two different additional databases on the right-hand side of the OneSearch interface, as the video tutorial describes.  What additional databases did you choose?  Why did you choose these particular databases? 2. Did you find any additional potential articles for your research?  If so, please post the name of the article and why you feel it is useful to you.  If not, please describe the types of articles you found through this new method and why you did not feel they had the potential to add to your research. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iamY7bra74

Synthesizing sources — four movie reviews of “Steve Jobs”

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays   This week , you are reading four movie  reviews of the movieSteve Jobs.  The reviews are from Ann Hornaday, Rex Reed, Benjamin Lee, and Anthony Lane. After perusing the four movie reviews, please complete the following tasks: You will notice that the four reviewers do not agree on their evaluation of the acting in the film.  1. First, analyze all four reviewers and, for each reviewer, write at least one summary sentence describing what the review says about the acting in the film.  In addition, for each reviewer, quote the reviewer at least one time to demonstrate the sentiment he or she expresses about the acting. Ann Hornaday-  Summary statement: Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement: Rex Reed- Summary statement: Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement: Benjamin Lee- Summary statement: Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement:  Anthony Lane – Summary statement: Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement: 2. Then, construct a synthesis matrix on the four authors and their views on the acting in the film.  The first item in Content for week in our class is a link to a document from North Carolina State University on using a synthesis matrix.   Use that handout as a guide. For example, you might make “acting by Kate Winslet” a category in your matrix.  Then you would write notes about what each movie reviewer said about Kate Winslet’s acting.  You might make “acting by Michael Fassbender” a category in your table.  Then you would write notes about what each movie reviewer said about Michael Fassbender’s acting.   Continue with this theme by creating three or four categories. 3. Finally, write three or four short paragraphs that synthesize all four reviewers and the points they make on the acting in the film.  Remember, when synthesizing, you don’t simply list what each author says about the topic.  You write about the issue of acting in the film and integrate the points of all four reviewers into that analysis. In writing your paragraphs, you would use your synthesis matrix.  You would group authors into categories, if possible.  For example, consider the reviewers that tend to praise the acting and write about them in a paragraph or two.  Then consider the reviewers that did not like the acting and write about them in a paragraph or two.  Following this analysis, you might write a concluding paragraph that summarizes all four reviewers’ views on the acting.

English 103 Critical Thinking Lesson 1 Review Quiz before real Quiz

Tiny Chris look, the teacher said  Your lesson quiz will test your knowledge of the information presented in the course overview and syllabus.

1 Dr Joseph Goebbels was the Third Reich’s master propagandist. He was

1  Dr Joseph Goebbels was the Third Reich’s master propagandist. He was born on 29th October 1897 in the Rhineland, to a pious Catholic family. He attended a Roman Catholic school and later studied History and Literature at the University of Heidelberg under a Jewish literary historian. During the First world war, military service rejected him because of his crippled foot. His clubfoot was a result of contracting polio as a child. Also, he had a diminutive figure and black hair. His physique led the German people to refer to him as the “little doctor.” What he lacked for in physique his intellect made up for it. Being conscious of his disability, he strived to belong to the ruling class. The fear of being regarded as a self-proclaimed intellectual fueled his insatiable thirst for power. He was described as cynical, hostile and hateful to the entire human race. All these traits in his personality were as a result of self-loathing, and inferiority complex (“Joseph Goebbels”). He was also quite skilled at igniting the same emotional state of rage and hatred that he felt onto masses both verbally and via writing. A friend introduced him to socialist and communist ideas. Later, he joined the NSDAP in 1922. Initially, he was not antisemitic. Goebbels was under Professor Friedrich Gundolf, a Jewish professor renowned as a Goethe scholar and a close disciple of the poet Stefan George, whom he looked up to and admired (“Joseph Goebbels | German Propagandist”). The development of his antisemitic beliefs is believed to be purely tactical. Before joining the Nazi party, his talents were unappreciated. He tried his luck as a novelist. He only wrote a single book that was published in 1926. Nevertheless, Goebbels was intelligent, sensible, sharp, and his oration skills were exceptional (Michael 3).  He put his skills to use for the Nazi administration. The Nazi saw his potential, and he became the district administrator of the National Socialist Worker’s Party (NSDAP) in Elberfeld. He established and edited the NS letters (Nationalsozialistischen Briefe). The main theme of these publications was to spread the anti-capitalist opinion and mobilise the citizens. The papers would draw examples from the Soviet Russia which he regarded as a socialist and nationalist country. He was among the co-authors of the Hanover conference in 1926, which called for the expulsion of Adolf Hitler (“Joseph Goebbels”). Goebbels’s political savvy instinct made him switch to Hitler’s side in the same year. Hitler rewarded him by appointing him as the Nazi district leader of Berlin-Brandenburg. Berlin-Brandenburg was on the northern side of Germany where the Strasser brothers were superior. Goebbels was able to take control of the region by establishing and editing his weekly newspaper. He discovered the power of words both oral and written on the credulous German population. He hatched schemes, published propaganda, and orchestrated impressive parades to further his political agendas. Propaganda is biased information that is used to promote a political cause. By 1927, his powerful voice and his ability to appeal to people’s emotions made him the most influential demagogue in the capital city (“Joseph Goebbels | German Propagandist”). The onset of the great depression made the citizens more credulous to his manipulation. He silenced his opponents by combining slander and insinuation to attack them. Hitler was quite impressed and appointed him as Reich Propaganda leader of the NSDAP in 1929. Goebbels was solely responsible for the creation of the myth that Hitler was the long-awaited messiah-redeemer. The facade created a theatrical element in almost all of the Nazi meetings, and through planned stage manipulation he was able to convince German masses to surrender to their “messiah” willfully. The main idea behind this was to create a pseudo-religious cult that revered Hitler as one who came to save them from the Marxist, Jews, and profiteers. He campaigned for Hitler all over the country. They organised thousands of meetings and speeches in which the two were able to convince the German people to vote for them(“Joseph Goebbels “). That year the party got 107 seats in the Reichstag. Goebbels used short silent films for the campaign. Often, he appealed to people’s fear, and his poster had an illustration of giants crushing his political opponents. Once the election was over, he once again declared his hate for democracy by saying “We are entering the Reichstag, in order that we may arm ourselves with the weapons of democracy from its arsenal. We shall become Reichstag deputies in order that the Weimar ideology should itself help us to destroy it.” (“Joseph Goebbels”)  During the next election in 1932, he used his mastery in the techniques of mass persuasion to win over the hearts of many citizens. However, his efforts were not enough, and they lost the election. In a shocking twist, the current president Peter Von Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler as chancellor. Goebbels organised a torchlight parade in Berlin to celebrate Hitler’s appointment to the chancellor (“Joseph Goebbels | German Propagandist”) . Hitler took his time before appointing Joseph as a Minister, but he was finally appointed as Minister of Propaganda on 4th March 1933 (Rentschler 27). This post gave him power over all the communication media such as radio, press, cinemas to mention but a few. He quickly sought to control all the editors in the state. He made them publish propaganda through bribery and corruption. He propagated his racist ideals and even spearheaded the burning of books ritual. Books from Jewish writers and works that explained Marxist ideologies were set aflame in huge bonfires all across the country. He continued his propagation of hate and incitation of violence. He referred to the USA and London as the “Jewish financiers.” He managed to get the support of Soviet Russia in attacking London and Washington for being the chief enemy of the Third Reich. The boycott against Jewish penetration of professions was staged due to his mass persuasion. He convinced Germans that Jews had taken over their business and that was the reason that many Germans were unemployed. The Nazi government sought to do things differently for a while and they suppressed Goebbels instincts to sow discord. However, he orchestrated the night of broken glasses, which was organized destruction of synagogues, Jewish houses, and shops followed by the arrest of Jewish individuals. Later, he aided in the organization and orchestration of the “Final Solution.” The final solution was the mass annihilation of the Jewish people(“Joseph Goebbels”). He had an inferiority complex that made him resent humanity. Hence, the manipulation of the Germans to take arms against the Jews and the rise of such a tyrant to power can be explained by Joseph Goebbels manipulation. He was the little man that pulled all the strings and determined the reality of many people.  Plato’s Allegory could describe the German society back then. In Plato’s allegory, he described people who were imprisoned in a cave in such a way that they could not move and look what was behind them and only saw a wall. Behind these prisoners was a fire that was raised such that the only thing they saw was the shadows cast onto the wall in front of them (“The Internet Classics Archive | The Republic by Plato”). Those who imprisoned them set a stage and screen and periodically moved with objects of animals and people and like puppet masters. Hence the perception of these prisoners was limited to only the shadows they saw before them. One prisoner was released and hence had the chance to look behind. He took time before he figured of that what was behind was the reality as he had grown quite accustomed to the illusion of shadows. Then, he was led outside the cave. He saw the sun for the first time and could move freely. He took the time to appreciate the reality and felt sorry for those in the cave. He went back to enlighten them.   The story of Joseph Goebbels shows us the power of the intellectual individuals in society. Goebbels was a scholar. He used his intellect to paint illusions for the citizens that the Nazi party was working towards the unification of the nation. The perception that the citizens got from this demagogue was that of hatred towards diversity. Hence, according to this parable, the enlightened ones are the prisoner that got released. It would have definitely taken time to see what was happening as the Government was the puppet master. They controlled the information that the citizens received by taking control of the communication media and eliminating those who dared speak up. Those who were slightly enlightened about the government dealings had an obligation to help educate the citizens. However, the citizens, in this case, are like the prisoners that remained in the cave when the other came to educate them they sneered and laughed at him. They believed entirely in the illusion as they had not experienced the truth. Hence, the mockery to the enlightened prisoner. The propaganda that Goebbels used was one that he cleverly orchestrated for it to be experienced by the people. Due to the fact that people believe that what they experience they completely fell for his traps. He would organize beer brawls and other violent acts and blame it on the opposition to get a good following. 2 To say that there is a disbelief in how an entire nation was able to turn a blind eye from the atrocities of a German dictator would seem like a lie in the modern age. Today, Hitler is considered to be ruthless, manipulative, and evil incarnate. Those around him, such as his minister of propaganda Joseph Goebbels, does not fall too far from the evil origin. Considering all the crimes and murders that happened, it seems almost impossible to believe that the Germans did not know that what was being done to the Jews during that time was an evil act. They were in the same country, there were Germans who had Jewish friends, and they were more or less at the heart of the conflict, a number of them saluting the Fuhrer. However, it cannot also be denied that the atrocities look even more horrendous from an outsider’s point of view, especially when those on the inside have been forced to see a view that has already been filtered and beautified to be more accepting of this violence. This is the role that the little doctor, more known as the head of the Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda during the Third Reich, Joseph Goebbels. Goebbels earned the right to the name with the way he made use of the right communication tools, the strategy of going for the educational system as a foundation for his propaganda, and his fidelity to his Fuhrer. “A master of psychological manipulation and one of the earliest propagandists to recognize the enormous role that radio could play in controlling mass populations, Goebbels pushed the National Socialist agenda with the cold vehemence of a true believer” (Cosgrove). Because of his actions, he was told by Adolf Hitler that, “Dr. Goebbels was gifted with the two things without which the situation in Berlin could not have been mastered: verbal facility and Intellect. For Dr. Goebbels, who had not found much in the way of a political organization when he started, had won Berlin in the truest sense of the word.” (“Joseph Goebbels, 1897-1945”). Early on in July 1932, Goebbels already knew the strategy that he wanted to take when he was appointed this position. His vision was on a massive scale; he wanted an empire that “would control schools, universities, film radio, and propaganda” (“Ministry Of Propaganda And Enlightenment”). This came to the point that the national education of the entire German people were entrusted in his hands. What is interesting with Goebbels approach is that he even had a disdain for the term, believing that propaganda pointed to lies. His reach had mandates for various sectors, including journalists who needed to follow instructions in reportage to school and their respective curriculum. The punishment for disobedience resulted in being terminated or sent to concentration camps. The biggest change that he effected in Germany was to target schools books and curriculum to teach a history that was of their own writing. For Goebbels, propaganda here worked as a way to control the empire they were trying to create. “Propaganda is a necessity for those wishing to convince a population to accept their leadership and conform to their ideologies” (Appleby 3). In fact, the changes were gradual; swastika flags first made their appearances in textbooks, but before long, the revisions and censorships occured, all to stress Germany as the hero in the world’s history and everyone else as villains or minor roles. According to Shani, “these books were not only in the schoolchildren’s satchel or in the school library. They were not considered propaganda; they were part of the official curriculum. Parents, grandparents, the children’s whole milieu, knew what they were learning and memorizing and what they studied for before exams,and proudly reinforced and supported them” (Shani). Because of the changes done to the textbooks and the indoctrination of the mishmash of fact with fantasy created by the propaganda behind Nazism, the belief became the absolute truth. “I wasn’t just education and training that made millions of students believe in it, not with such totality. They saw the light, they were strengthened in their belief and upheld scrupulously the ‘new scientific religion’” (Shani). The term “little doctor” shares a very significant to the underhanded meaning of doctoring a particular situation, thing, or even person. Doctors are known to cure, heal, and provide comfort. Yet, even in the modern sense, the term “doctoring” can refer to an alteration, be it a document or even the more infamous one, going to a doctor to go under the knife and be changed via plastic surgery. As in the modern understanding, “the ‘little doctor’ is still a byword for the black arts of political spin and politicians regularly accuse each other of telling fibs ‘worthy of Goebbels’” (Jones). The title also applies to Joseph Goebbels, who was known to be Hitler’s “little doctor.” Perhaps the only irony in his moniker is the word “little,” for there is nothing little or insignificant about his actions and decisions that changed Hitler’s image and tidied it up to swallow Berlin whole in doubt and delusion. If there was to be a great example of the cavemen in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” it would have to be Brunhilde Pomsel, Joseph Goebbels’ secretary. In an interview with The Guardian before the release of a documentary featuring her interview, Pomsel gave a few details about her time as secretary to the little doctor. Among the excerpts of her dialogue, the words that she uttered and the attitude that she had taken were disturbingly similar to those of the Cavemen. The comfort and privileges she had as Goebbels’ secretary was her own cave. Whether it was enjoying a 275-mark salary worth a fortune during the time or being showered with gifts like the blue silk suit she was given as compensation for the destruction of the flat that she owned with her parents during the bombing raid, she was trapped with the projections of the shadows in front of her. She was unable to turn the other way, because she was even schooled from the start with a Prussian discipline and thrived in the attention that Goebbels’ advisers gave her as his secretary. From the beginning of the period, Pomsel was already trapped, her neck and legs chained only so she look forward to the deceptions that Hitler and his army had put up. Goebbels was one of the passersby, the leader of them who would direct how objects were projected and what can be projected for them to see. He was the one moving behind the shadows, or if we can extend the metaphor, the one directing how the passersby would move around, how the would act, and what they would show the onlookers, such as Pomsel. This emphasizes Pomsel’s reactions about how they, as part of the Nazi party, were treated and seen. For her, she should not have been persecuted as she feels that she did no wrong. She was merely following orders; when she was told not to look at a document, she felt compelled to do so and was proud when she was able to do it (Connolly). The objects that were being passed through the raised way to reflect shadows are the idealisms that Goebbels and the Nazi party had. They were changed and altered to become mere shadows of the reality of what they were. For instance, the reality of the world’s history was filtered through and projected back in a new form through a revised and censored education of the entire German people. And given how entire generations and children were taught these doctrines, it became hard for them to truly separate the reality of what they learned from the reality of the world. This is mostly because they were forced and chained to study a particular brand of history, and this came to be their truth. So even if someone who has seen the reality of the cave and come back to warn them, all they can do is either deny what happened like Pomsel or become defensive about the philosophies. It may not necessarily be that they are condoning evil willingly; they may not just be equipped enough to recognize that it is evil, with the background, education, and experience that they had growing up in a world of Nazi propaganda.

All the information needed to work on this paper are listed in

All the information needed to work on this paper are listed in the attachment below.

When Checks and Balances Fail In February 2017, Dr. Christopher Duntsch

  When Checks and Balances Fail In February 2017, Dr. Christopher Duntsch became the first surgeon in American history known to be sentenced to prison for botching a patient surgery. A licensed neurosurgeon, Duntsch left a string of deaths and maimed bodies in his wake: He was accused of causing the death of two surgery patients and leaving 33 others permanently damaged. His patients left their lives in his hands; he left them paralyzed or dead. The checks and balances that were supposed to contain Duntsch failed utterly. His medical school licensed him but didn’t require the preparation necessary to instill competence. Hospitals suspended him but didn’t report him. The medical board could do nothing without forms filed against him. Patients were left without recourse. When checks and balances fail, damage is usually the result. That’s why when it came to our system of government, the founders were so focused on creating gridlock. They recognized that in a system in which legitimacy sprang from popular support, the easy path to perdition lay in popularly backed centralized power — tyranny could spring just as easily from a popular majority as from a king or despot. The founders didn’t trust individuals with authority, and they didn’t trust human beings to delegate authority to mere individuals. But popular governments have always bucked against such limitations.  The majority of Americans always want action, on some grounds or others. That leads to an eternal drive to grant unchecked power to some institution of government. As Alexis de Tocqueville writes in his 1840 “Democracy in America”: “It may easily be foreseen that almost all the able and ambitious members of a democratic community will labor without ceasing to extend the powers of government, because they all hope at some time or other to wield those powers. … Centralization will be the natural government.” We’re now seeing the consequences of such centralization on two separate fronts: the president’s authority to declare a national emergency and the FBI’s investigations into the president. Proponents of President Trump would like to see power centralized in the presidency; antagonists of President Trump would like to see power centralized in the FBI. President Trump’s allies seem eager for Trump to declare a national emergency in order to appropriate funds for a border wall. The law cuts against such a declaration: The National Emergencies Act was written to curtail presidential authority, not increase it. No matter how much border hawks (including me) want a border barrier, the proper method is to request funds from Congress. Meanwhile, President Trump’s enemies are celebrating reports this week that the FBI investigated Trump as a possible Russian agent after his firing of then-FBI director James Comey. Trump had authority under the Constitution to fire Comey, and there’s no actual evidence that Trump is an agent of the Russians. But Trump’s enemies want the legislature to step in and attempt to protect the FBI from executive branch checks on it.   We’re now seeing the consequences of such centralization on two separate fronts: the president’s authority to declare a national emergency and the FBI’s investigations into the president. Proponents of President Trump would like to see power centralized in the presidency; antagonists of President Trump would like to see power centralized in the FBI. President Trump’s allies seem eager for Trump to declare a national emergency in order to appropriate funds for a border wall. The law cuts against such a declaration: The National Emergencies Act was written to curtail presidential authority, not increase it. No matter how much border hawks (including me) want a border barrier, the proper method is to request funds from Congress. Meanwhile, President Trump’s enemies are celebrating reports this week that the FBI investigated Trump as a possible Russian agent after his firing of then-FBI director James Comey. Trump had authority under the Constitution to fire Comey, and there’s no actual evidence that Trump is an agent of the Russians. But Trump’s enemies want the legislature to step in and attempt to protect the FBI from executive branch checks on it. Scott Morefield All of this is foolish. It’s good that the legislative branch checks the executive branch, and it’s good that the executive branch must remain in control of executive branch agencies. Here’s the easy test: How would you feel if the situations were reversed? How would Republicans feel about an emergency declaration from a Democratic president to shift funds to leftist priorities? How would Democrats feel about Republican attempts to seize control of the FBI for purposes of investigating a Democratic president?Nobody ought to trust institutions enough to grant them unchecked power. And no one ought to trust the people enough to allow us to do so. Ben Shapiro, 35, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, host of “The Ben Shapiro Show” and editor-in-chief of DailyWire.com. He is The New York Times best-selling author of “Bullies.” He lives with his wife and two children in Los Angeles.

【 Course of Academic Writing Strategies 】【Because it can be used as

【 Course of Academic Writing Strategies 】【Because it can be used as an advanced sources evaluation for the subsequent final research essay, if you write well, you can continue to write the final research essay recently.】 First, you are to write a short paragraph outlining the topic you will address in your final essay (you can choose a topic to write on for the final project). At this early stage, you need not have a defined thesis. Rather describe the research question (the issue) you wish to pursue for your final paper and establish its significance to you. This section answers the following kinds of questions: What exactly do you want to study? Why is it an important issue to you and how familiar are you with the issue? Who is your intended (specialized) audience?  The focus of this part of the assignment can be somewhat personal.  Second, this assignment should give me a sense for your research abilities so take time to review and select material carefully. This section of your assignment demonstrates your ability to search for source material in databases for example. Ideally, the more academic your source material the better. For this reason, things like Encyclopaedias, textbooks, magazines, Google, etc. are not adequate.  For the second part of the assignment, provide a list of 3 sources – at least two of which are scholarly, peer –reviewed journal articles. Other material you use might include  books, government documents and reports, materials from archives (maps, briefing notes, etc.), legal cases, interviews, etc. Provide a short summary of each source and explain why the sources are pertinent and credible for your purposes. Also, provide before each paragraph the correct citation for each source. This assignment should not exceed two pages (a short paragraph identifying your topic, three short paragraphs outlining each source)   The paper should be in APA format. Use Times New Roman 12 point font as your font type.  

Your supervisor has asked you to write a brief email on

  Your supervisor has asked you to write a brief email on the vacation policy changes to be distributed to staff. You will need to listen to a voice mail from your supervisor with instructions on how to create the email to announce the new vacation policy. The voice mail will include specific details that must be followed in creating the email. Listen to your supervisor’s voice mail here. Create an email message in which you: Create a one to two (1-2) paragraph email with five to seven (5-7) sentences that follows your supervisor’s instructions.   Target the appropriate professional audience. Use appropriate language for professional audience. Use correct email formatting. Follow appropriate netiquette rules for electronic communication. Meet the 250-to-500-word minimum requirement. Use correct sentence mechanics, grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style. Provide the following heading on page one of your email and then begin your email: TO: Insert Professor’s Name FROM: Insert Your Name DATE: Insert Assignment’s Due Date RE: Create a title that relates to your topic and gets your audience’s attention

pages 209 till 254 needed to answer these question, i need short

pages 209 till 254 needed to answer these question, i need short answers for the following question

you will be writing a summary for a particular audience

  You have a scenario you must respond to as a writer: You are working for a general interest magazine that covers topics from the environment to popular culture. Your editor has asked you to write a short summary for the science and environment section on climate change. Your editor explains that there is a lot of confusion and conflicting information on the topic, and she wants the readers of your magazine to have the key information summarized and clarified. Your first step is to find an article that summarizes the current situation on climate change. You can find an article at the following location: Page, M. L. (2014, March 9). How much hotter is the planet going to get? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. In NewScientist Environment. Retrieved from http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25187-how-much-hotter-is-the-planet-going-to-get.html?full=true#.Ux3KJo2MEkV Your task now is to create a short summary of about 250 words that presents the key ideas from this article for your readers who might be confused about climate change and wondering what is really going on. Remember, your summary must be objective. Your editor has made it clear that you are to leave your opinion out of this piece.

Please see attachment, its a 500 word essay with 5 paragraphs. please

Please see attachment, its a 500 word essay with 5 paragraphs. please read carefully instructions 

In Lesson 1, we discussed audience awareness. As you move forward

In Lesson 1, we discussed audience awareness. As you move forward in our course, think about audience. Think about audience in all things that you do. If your coffee is not right at Starbucks, then think about the barista as your audience before you air your grievances. If you need to bring something up to your superior, consider how you are automatically aware of audience as you plan your strategy. For this discussion board, consider all of the different audiences you encounter throughout the day on a weekly basis. Who do you talk to and encounter? How do you change your approach with each audience? Do you speak differently to friends than you do to your children? If you have to call an insurance company, do you speak differently to the agent on the phone than to your grandmother? Describe at least two interactions and how they are different from one another. You might want to include two interactions that describe your life situation, like where you work or live.

English Composition Assignment

Post Two: Write
the memory of a childhood event that recounts a story related to your
own identity as a boy or a girl and a moment of realizing gender
differences. Think about the importance of the event, and what you
learned from it that stays with you today. Refer to Chapter One for
ideas to help generate your blog ideas.
Post Three: Write
a memory of a family event or scene that had an impact on your growth
and development. Think about the importance of the event, and what you
learned from it that stays with you today. Refer to Chapter Two for
ideas to help generate your blog ideas.

[supanova_question]

First, go to the “What Color is Your Parachute?” website and