), or “duty theory”. Deontological ethics (Links to an external site.) is concerned with our

), or “duty theory”. Deontological ethics (Links to an external site.) is concerned with our.

), or “duty theory”. Deontological ethics (Links to an external site.) is concerned with our obligations to follow certain ethical rules and principles (our “duties”), which the deontologist believes takes moral precedence over the consequences of our actions. While the consequentialists argue that we should maximize happiness (“the good”), the deontologists stress our obligation to follow ethical principles (“the right”).
Your assignment for this lesson is to discuss how professional obligations and duties can inform your choices on the job. When, if ever, are principles more important than consequences? In particular, I’d like you to think about when your professional obligations require that you “follow orders”, and when your professional obligations require that you “break the corporate script” and disobey orders. In a business environment, you may find yourself with multiple, conflicting orders, some of which violate ethical principles or your own value system. How do we decide which values and principles ought to determine our actions? This issue is brought into high relief by the issue of whistle blowing, (Links to an external site.) especially in the debate between De George and Birch over the details of the Pinto case. Should Pinto engineers have blown the whistle on the poor management and design decisions at Ford?
[supanova_question]

Chapter 9 11 and 12 You have audiobook and attached book that you can base your

Chapter 9 11 and 12

You have audiobook and attached book that you can base your essay

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aYwVDAG6o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rF4gIQ2qqM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHO3Lw1zvks

1. First, clearly explain these three different principles.

Principle of Universalizability
Principle of Humanity
Principle of Utility

2. Second, give a novel example (of your creation) that illustrates the difference between these principles In particular, you should choose an example where the principles will each yield different advice about what you ought to do in the scenario you have given.

3. Finally, say which principle you think gives the right answer for the case you’ve chosen and explain why you think this.

three pages double-spaced in 12 pt. font. Your citations may follow any style you wish (MLA, APA), just pick one style and follow it. More important than your word count or formatting, however, is the thoughtfulness of your paper. Focus on that first and foremost and then clean it up to make it fit the superficial length and formatting requirements. Please submit a draft and ask what I think before finalizing your essay let me know if you need more days[supanova_question]

), or “duty theory”. Deontological ethics (Links to an external site.) is concerned with our

Philosophy Assignment Help ), or “duty theory”. Deontological ethics (Links to an external site.) is concerned with our obligations to follow certain ethical rules and principles (our “duties”), which the deontologist believes takes moral precedence over the consequences of our actions. While the consequentialists argue that we should maximize happiness (“the good”), the deontologists stress our obligation to follow ethical principles (“the right”).
Your assignment for this lesson is to discuss how professional obligations and duties can inform your choices on the job. When, if ever, are principles more important than consequences? In particular, I’d like you to think about when your professional obligations require that you “follow orders”, and when your professional obligations require that you “break the corporate script” and disobey orders. In a business environment, you may find yourself with multiple, conflicting orders, some of which violate ethical principles or your own value system. How do we decide which values and principles ought to determine our actions? This issue is brought into high relief by the issue of whistle blowing, (Links to an external site.) especially in the debate between De George and Birch over the details of the Pinto case. Should Pinto engineers have blown the whistle on the poor management and design decisions at Ford?
[supanova_question]

Chapter 9 11 and 12 You have audiobook and attached book that you can base your

Chapter 9 11 and 12

You have audiobook and attached book that you can base your essay

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4aYwVDAG6o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rF4gIQ2qqM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHO3Lw1zvks

1. First, clearly explain these three different principles.

Principle of Universalizability
Principle of Humanity
Principle of Utility

2. Second, give a novel example (of your creation) that illustrates the difference between these principles In particular, you should choose an example where the principles will each yield different advice about what you ought to do in the scenario you have given.

3. Finally, say which principle you think gives the right answer for the case you’ve chosen and explain why you think this.

three pages double-spaced in 12 pt. font. Your citations may follow any style you wish (MLA, APA), just pick one style and follow it. More important than your word count or formatting, however, is the thoughtfulness of your paper. Focus on that first and foremost and then clean it up to make it fit the superficial length and formatting requirements. Please submit a draft and ask what I think before finalizing your essay let me know if you need more days[supanova_question]

), or “duty theory”. Deontological ethics (Links to an external site.) is concerned with our